Article 423PA Lyft drivers sue, argue that they’re employees rather than contractors

Lyft drivers sue, argue that they’re employees rather than contractors

by
Cyrus Farivar
from Ars Technica - All content on (#423PA)
GettyImages-508246182-800x532.jpg

Enlarge (credit: Mike Coppola/Getty Images for Lyft)

Two Lyft drivers, one in Massachusetts and one in California, have recently filed another pair of proposed class-action lawsuits.

Like in previous similar cases, the plaintiffs accuse the ride-hailing company of inadequately paying them and misclassifying them as contractors rather than employees. By classifying the bulk of its workforce as contractors, Lyft and other companies like it are almost certainly saving millions of dollars per year in costs that they would otherwise have to pay, including drivers' health insurance, retirement, unemployment, and other benefits that typically come with full-time employment.

The Massachusetts case, Wickberg v. Lyft, was brought earlier this month by Boston-based attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan, who has made a name for herself bringing similar labor lawsuits against gig economy startups in recent years.

Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=ww1EuewWP90:c7szIketXqw:V_sGLiPB index?i=ww1EuewWP90:c7szIketXqw:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments