Brexit now only belongs to the lawless ‘party of law and order’

There is no need to 'honour the referendum' when it conflicts with our greater duty to honour Britain's national interest

It is a great tribute to the supreme court that it called Boris Johnson's bluff when he tried to prorogue parliament (with the emphasis on "rogue"). Lord Pannick QC, who triumphed in the case brought by the patriotic hero Gina Miller, recalls that he was on safari, watching wild animals in Botswana, when he heard what "wild political animals" were up to in London.

"How ironic," says Pannick, "that the case arose in the context of Brexit, a political policy that its supporters justify by the wish to return sovereignty to parliament and to make our supreme court supreme over the European court of justice."

Apparently none other an authority than Dominic Cummings has conceded that "there is a strong democratic case" for a second referendum

Continue reading...