Article 4VE50 It’s the user’s fault if a Ring camera violates your privacy, Amazon says

It’s the user’s fault if a Ring camera violates your privacy, Amazon says

by
Kate Cox
from Ars Technica - All content on (#4VE50)
Ring_doorbell-800x415.jpg

Enlarge / Your local police might like to interest you in this product. (credit: Amazon)

Amazon subsidiary Ring, which makes home surveillance equipment and cameras, has "partnerships" with more than 600 law enforcement agencies nationwide, allowing those police access to users' footage. And while Ring says it sets terms around how and when it will share that footage with police, anything the police do with it afterward is entirely out of its hands, the company says.

The partnerships between Ring and police, and the terms of the agreements, have not been transparent to the general public. Instead, they've come out in bits and pieces in media reports throughout the year. Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) in September demanded clearer answers from Amazon about Ring and published the company's responses this week.

In the pair of replies (PDF 1, PDF 2), Ring repeatedly deflects responsibility for the contents of captured footage to the consumers who capture it and the police departments that acquire it.

Read 31 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=drW905KnnvQ:LXqq9oWWSE4:V_sGLiPB index?i=drW905KnnvQ:LXqq9oWWSE4:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments