Article 51EXG Court: Violating a site’s terms of service isn’t criminal hacking

Court: Violating a site’s terms of service isn’t criminal hacking

by
Timothy B. Lee
from Ars Technica - All content on (#51EXG)
GettyImages-1140860048-800x533.jpg

Enlarge (credit: Jamie Grill / Getty)

A federal court in Washington, DC, has ruled that violating a website's terms of service isn't a crime under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, America's primary anti-hacking law. The lawsuit was initiated by a group of academics and journalists with the support of the American Civil Liberties Union.

The plaintiffs wanted to investigate possible racial discrimination in online job markets by creating accounts for fake employers and job seekers. Leading job sites have terms of service prohibiting users from supplying fake information, and the researchers worried that their research could expose them to criminal liability under the CFAA, which makes it a crime to "access a computer without authorization or exceed authorized access."

So in 2016 they sued the federal government, seeking a declaration that this part of the CFAA violated the First Amendment.

Read 12 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=YgM41yZz3KE:y2q13CtXRgA:V_sGLiPB index?i=YgM41yZz3KE:y2q13CtXRgA:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments