It’s “now or never” on climate change, but that doesn’t mean we’re doomed

Making our climate solutions equitable. Click here for transcript. (video link)

Human beings have made tremendous scientific and technological breakthroughs, but our continued social and cultural advancement has come at the expense of our planet's ecosystems, endangered by human-driven global climate change. Ars Science Editor John Timmer joined climatologist Michael Mann of Penn State University (moving to the University of Pennsylvania this fall) and Sally Benson, deputy director for energy and chief strategist for the energy transition at the White House of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), for a spirited discussion about the existential threat of climate change; viable-and ethical-solutions to that threat; and the need to face the grim reality the planet faces without giving in to so-called climate "doom-ism."

The discussion took place in the wake of the most recent report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)-technically the third and final section of the 6th Assessment Report-concluding that the next few years are a critical window of opportunity if we hope to limit global warming to the benchmarks of 1.5 C or 2 C. The good news: There are signs of clear progress, most notably an acceleration in the growth of the clean energy sector. The bad news: We are at the peak of the so-called emissions curve, so emissions must begin declining now. Jim Skea (co-chair of the group behind the report), described it as a "now or never" scenario.

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments