Article 6DSZ6 New Sandra and Woo comic: MH370 until proven otherwise

New Sandra and Woo comic: MH370 until proven otherwise

by
Novil
from Gaia on (#6DSZ6)

For those who haven't noticed yet: I have published a new Sandra and Woo comic about UFOs. Here's the whole article below the comic:

-

UFO footage feat. a Boeing 777, presumably from a General Atomics MQ-1C Grey Eagle drone (Video on Archive.org):

https://www.sandraandwoo.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ufo-footage-drone.mp4

UFO footage feat. a Boeing 777, presumably from a NROL-22 spy satellite (Video on Archive.org):

https://www.sandraandwoo.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ufo-footage-satellite.mp4

18 reasons why these videos are remarkable, despite the outrageous content:

  1. The coordinates in the satellite video are close to the point where MH370 was last seen on 8 March 2014.
  2. The airplane is clearly a Boeing 777. No other airplane of that type has been reported as missing. The video was posted approx. two months after the disappearance of MH370. So there's a very high probability that the footage is supposed to show MH370.
  3. After MH370 diverted from its original flight path, it's more than reasonable to assume that the US military observed it with its spy satellites, drones and fighter jets in the vicinity.
  4. Above all, both videos show a remarkable amount of realism and attention to detail:
    1. Flight path
    2. Contrail
    3. Camera movement
    4. Mouse movement
    5. Spherical movements of the UFOs
  5. The two videos are in sync.
  6. The drone video has a higher framerate than the satellite video, as expected.
  7. The drone video shows details like the hot pitot tube of the drone.
  8. The satellite video comes in stereoscopic 3D, as expected.
  9. The clouds in the satellite video move in a realistic manner.
  10. The clouds in the satellite video are realistically illuminated after the explosion.
  11. The coordinates in the satellite video are updated quickly during mouse drags.
  12. Creating these videos with this remarkable attention to detail with hardware and software available in 2014 within two months would have required considerable expertise, time and dedication.
  13. An animator with several years of experience attempted a recreation of the drone video and noted that it would be nearly impossible" to recreate such a realistic version.
  14. Creating these videos based on pre-existing footage of an airplane may have been easier. But no such footage has been found so far. The two versions of the satellite video also make this considerably harder.
  15. It's possible that the videos were created by an US agency such as the CIA, who would have had easy access to classified footage and expert animators. But what would have been the purpose of such a psy-op? The videos were posted on a minor YouTube channel in 2014 and then quickly forgotten.
  16. It's possible that the satellite video was actually leaked much earlier, only four days after the disappearance of MH370, as indicated by the comment of the video uploader RegicideAnon: Received: 12 March 2014". This would make the creation of the video an extremely challenging task.
  17. [Update: 13 August 2023] A third video that contains scenes from both videos was uploaded to Vimeo on August 2014 by a different user and is still available there. Interestingly, the satellite footage occupies a bit more screen space in it. We therefore know that the YouTube video was cropped for some reason and isn't the original video either. This also reduces the possibility that the dates on Archive.org were tempered with and the videos were actually uploaded to YouTube years later.
  18. [Update: 13 August 2023] A disinformation campaign seems to be in full swing on Reddit's UFO boards and 4chan's /x/ board. For example, an unusual high number of posts try to discredit this remarkable footage with easily disprovable arguments. While trolls can never be ruled out, these could also be state actors from an US agency.

8 reasons why we currently can't rule out a fake either:

  1. If an experienced animator had access to such classified footage, adding the fantastical elements (UFOs, portal, disappeared airplane) within two months seems to be well in the realm of possibility.
  2. Some experts remarked that the airplane's thermal data in the drone video doesn't look exactly as expected.
  3. Other experts also pointed out potential issues with other minor elements of the drone video. However, nobody was able to point out a major mistake.
  4. Debris of MH370 was found. However, its validity has been disputed by some experts. It could have been planted as a cover-up.
  5. The portal in the drone video looks fake, like a bad CGI effect. But of course we have no example how such an effect may look like. If a (near-)perfect match could be found in some (old) CGI library, it would immediately discredit the footage as fake.
  6. The videos have no provenance!
  7. The original leaker, irrespective if it was RegicideAnon or someone else, did the bare minimum to present this unprecedented footage to the world. This certainly seems odd.
  8. We don't know how such classified military data may actually look like. A member of the US air force working with such systems on a daily basis may be able point out obvious flaws.
  9. [Update: 13 August 2023] A scene from the Taken TV show from 2002 shows remarkable similarity with the MH370 footage and could have been taken as inspiration by the hoaxer.

In any case, these videos are either real or the best UFO fake of all time. (UFO footage that's impossible to debunk because it's so blurry/featureless doesn't count.)

More info:

External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://www.sandraandwoo.com/gaia/feed/
Feed Title Gaia
Feed Link https://www.sandraandwoo.com/gaia
Reply 0 comments