Tories don’t realise that investment isn’t a cost: it’s a benefit | William Keegan

The shadow chancellor is often criticised for her centrist positions, but Labour's plan for a long-term rescue is a vital difference between the parties

When preparing to become Labour's chancellor in 1964, James Callaghan used to go up to Oxford for economics lessons at Nuffield College. The present shadow chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is already steeped in economic knowledge, including that of the UK's economic history, as her recent Mais lecture at Bayes business school made clear.

I was amused by some of the pre-lecture media speculation that Reeves might express her admiration for Margaret Thatcher. On the contrary, she let it be known, in an aside not in the printed text, that distaste for Thatcherism was one of her motives for going into politics.