Microsoft: all content on the web is fair use

When someone tells you who they are, believe them. Microsoft's AI chief Mustafa Suleyman:

With respect to content that is already on the open web, the social contract of that content since the '90s has been that it is fair use. Anyone can copy it, recreate with it, reproduce with it. That has been freeware, if you like. That's been the understanding.

Mustafa Suleyman

This is absolute bullshit from the first word to the very last. None of this is true - not even in the slightest. Content on the web is not free for the taking by anyone, especially not to be chewed up and regurgitated verbatim by spicy autocomplete tools. There is no social contract" to that effect. In fact, when I go to any of Microsoft's website, documents, videos, or any other content they publish online, on the open web, and scroll to the very bottom of the page, it's all got the little copyright symbol or similar messaging.

Once again, this underlines how entitled Silicon Valley techbros really are. If we violate even a gram of Microsoft's copyrights, we'd have their lawyers on our ass in weeks - but when Microsoft itself needs to violate copyright and licensing on an automated, industrial scale, for massive profits, everything is suddenly peace, love, and fair use. Men in Silicon Valley just do not understand consent. At all. And they show this time and time again.

Meanwhile, the Internet Archive has to deal with crap like this:

The lawsuit is about the longstanding and widespread library practice of controlled digital lending, which is how we lend the books we own to our patrons. As a result of the publishers' lawsuit, more than 500,000 books have been removed from our lending library.

Chris Freeland at the Internet Archive Blogs

Controlled lending without a profit motive is deemed illegal, but violating copyright and licensing on an automated, industrial scale is fair use. Make it make sense.

Make it make sense.