‘Quantum Memory’ Proves Exponentially Powerful
Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:
It's not easy to study quantum systems - collections of particles that follow the counterintuitive rules of quantum mechanics. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, a cornerstone of quantum theory, says it's impossible to simultaneously measure a particle's exact position and its speed - pretty important information for understanding what's going on.
In order to study, say, a particular collection of electrons, researchers have to be clever about it. They might take a box of electrons, poke at it in various ways, then take a snapshot of what it looks like at the end. In doing so, they hope to reconstruct the internal quantum dynamics at work.
But there's a catch: They can't measure all the system's properties at the same time. So they iterate. They'll start with their system, poke, then measure. Then they'll do it again. Every iteration, they'll measure some new set of properties. Build together enough snapshots, and machine learning algorithms can help reconstruct the full properties of the original system - or at least get really close.
This is a tedious process. But in theory, quantum computers could help. These machines, which work according to quantum rules, have the potential to be much better than ordinary computers at modeling the workings of quantum systems. They can also store information not in classic binary memory, but in a more complex form called quantum memory. This allows for far richer and more accurate descriptions of particles. It also means that the computer could keep multiple copies of a quantum state in its working memory.
[...] Now, two independent teams have come up with ways of getting by with far less quantum memory. In the first paper, Sitan Chen, a computer scientist at Harvard University, and his co-authors showed that just two copies of the quantum state could exponentially reduce the number of times you need to take a snapshot of your quantum system. Quantum memory, in other words, is almost always worth the investment.
These two- or three-copy measurements, they're more powerful than one might think," said Richard Kueng, a computer scientist at Johannes Kepler University Linz in Austria.
Read more of this story at SoylentNews.