How The Pentagon Is Adapting To China's Technological Rise

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

It's been just over two months since Kathleen Hicks stepped down as US deputy secretary of defense. As the highest-ranking woman in Pentagon history, Hicks shaped US military posture through an era defined by renewed competition between powerful countries and a scramble to modernize defense technology.

She's currently taking a break before jumping into her (still unannounced) next act. It's been refreshing," she says-but disconnecting isn't easy. She continues to monitor defense developments closely and expresses concern over potential setbacks: New administrations have new priorities, and that's completely expected, but I do worry about just stalling out on progress that we've built over a number of administrations."

Over the past three decades, Hicks has watched the Pentagon transform-politically, strategically, and technologically. She entered government in the 1990s at the tail end of the Cold War, when optimism and a belief in global cooperation still dominated US foreign policy. But that optimism dimmed. After 9/11, the focus shifted to counterterrorism and nonstate actors. Then came Russia's resurgence and China's growing assertiveness. Hicks took two previous breaks from government work-the first to complete a PhD at MIT and the second to join the think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), where she focused on defense strategy. By the time I returned in 2021," she says, there was one actor-the PRC (People's Republic of China)-that had the capability and the will to really contest the international system as it's set up."

In this conversation with MIT Technology Review, Hicks reflects on how the Pentagon is adapting-or failing to adapt-to a new era of geopolitical competition. She discusses China's technological rise, the future of AI in warfare, and her signature initiative, Replicator, a Pentagon initiative to rapidly field thousands of low-cost autonomous systems such as drones.

Yes, I do. China is the biggest pacing challenge we face, which means it sets the pace for most capability areas for what we need to be able to defeat to deter them. For example, surface maritime capability, missile capability, stealth fighter capability. They set their minds to achieving a certain capability, they tend to get there, and they tend to get there even faster.

That said, they have a substantial amount of corruption, and they haven't been engaged in a real conflict or combat operation in the way that Western militaries have trained for or been involved in, and that is a huge X factor in how effective they would be.

I would never want to underestimate their ability-or any nation's ability-to innovate organically when they put their minds to it. But I still think it's a helpful comparison to look at the US model. Because we're a system of free minds, free people, and free markets, we have the potential to generate much more innovation culturally and organically than a statist model does. That's our advantage-if we can realize it.

I do think it's a massive problem. When we were conceiving Replicator, one of the big concerns was that DJI had just jumped way out ahead on the manufacturing side, and the US had been left behind. A lot of manufacturers here believe they can catch up if given the right contracts-and I agree with that.

DJI's commercial-use drones are affordable and powerful, but their applications in a war zone have raised concerns in the US and beyond.

Read more of this story at SoylentNews.