Editor note! (Score: 4, Insightful) by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2014-11-11 20:49 (#2TZV) Vanderhoth - Hope my edits made this story more understandable without distorting anything! I spent a lot of time trying to get it into shape. It's an interesting story - thanks for all the time you put into it. Re: Editor note! (Score: 1) by vanderhoth@pipedot.org on 2014-11-12 20:03 (#2V0R) One thing I would have liked is if you had of left my disclosure in there. I am a supporter and don't want to give the impression that I'm trying to hide that in anyway. Otherwise I think the updates are fine.I'm a little shady on the WAM tool, it seems it's not only being abused, but it's also being used to collect data on "offenders". The problem being what some people consider harassment is really broad. I don't like the idea of a radical political organization (of any kind) collecting data on me, especially if the intention is to use it to label me has a harasser for just disagreeing politely with someone. Re: Editor note! (Score: 1) by tanuki64@pipedot.org on 2014-11-12 20:06 (#2V0S) but it's also being used to collect data on "offenders".This part is interesting. Any idea how this tool collects the data? Re: Editor note! (Score: 2, Informative) by useless@pipedot.org on 2014-11-12 22:28 (#2V0Z) Looks like it's just a simple web form:https://womenactionmedia.wufoo.com/forms/wam-twitter-harassment-reporting-tool/ Not sure why someone would not just use twitter's own mechanisms instead of some third party though. Re: Editor note! (Score: 1) by vanderhoth@pipedot.org on 2014-11-12 22:55 (#2V11) It basically just gives WAM first crack at "harassment" cases. Volunteers working with WAM can then make it a priority case for twitter to deal with. I assume at the expense of any other issues reported to twitter.So far though it's been effective in having non-harassing accounts like @nero and @RogueStarGamez temporarily suspended while twitter did a proper investigation.There was a tweet circulating with the names of people the "anti" side wanted banned. @nero, @RogueStarGamez, @Sargon_of_Akkad, @Int_Aristocrat are a few I remember out of six or seven
Re: Editor note! (Score: 1) by vanderhoth@pipedot.org on 2014-11-12 20:03 (#2V0R) One thing I would have liked is if you had of left my disclosure in there. I am a supporter and don't want to give the impression that I'm trying to hide that in anyway. Otherwise I think the updates are fine.I'm a little shady on the WAM tool, it seems it's not only being abused, but it's also being used to collect data on "offenders". The problem being what some people consider harassment is really broad. I don't like the idea of a radical political organization (of any kind) collecting data on me, especially if the intention is to use it to label me has a harasser for just disagreeing politely with someone. Re: Editor note! (Score: 1) by tanuki64@pipedot.org on 2014-11-12 20:06 (#2V0S) but it's also being used to collect data on "offenders".This part is interesting. Any idea how this tool collects the data? Re: Editor note! (Score: 2, Informative) by useless@pipedot.org on 2014-11-12 22:28 (#2V0Z) Looks like it's just a simple web form:https://womenactionmedia.wufoo.com/forms/wam-twitter-harassment-reporting-tool/ Not sure why someone would not just use twitter's own mechanisms instead of some third party though. Re: Editor note! (Score: 1) by vanderhoth@pipedot.org on 2014-11-12 22:55 (#2V11) It basically just gives WAM first crack at "harassment" cases. Volunteers working with WAM can then make it a priority case for twitter to deal with. I assume at the expense of any other issues reported to twitter.So far though it's been effective in having non-harassing accounts like @nero and @RogueStarGamez temporarily suspended while twitter did a proper investigation.There was a tweet circulating with the names of people the "anti" side wanted banned. @nero, @RogueStarGamez, @Sargon_of_Akkad, @Int_Aristocrat are a few I remember out of six or seven
Re: Editor note! (Score: 1) by tanuki64@pipedot.org on 2014-11-12 20:06 (#2V0S) but it's also being used to collect data on "offenders".This part is interesting. Any idea how this tool collects the data? Re: Editor note! (Score: 2, Informative) by useless@pipedot.org on 2014-11-12 22:28 (#2V0Z) Looks like it's just a simple web form:https://womenactionmedia.wufoo.com/forms/wam-twitter-harassment-reporting-tool/ Not sure why someone would not just use twitter's own mechanisms instead of some third party though. Re: Editor note! (Score: 1) by vanderhoth@pipedot.org on 2014-11-12 22:55 (#2V11) It basically just gives WAM first crack at "harassment" cases. Volunteers working with WAM can then make it a priority case for twitter to deal with. I assume at the expense of any other issues reported to twitter.So far though it's been effective in having non-harassing accounts like @nero and @RogueStarGamez temporarily suspended while twitter did a proper investigation.There was a tweet circulating with the names of people the "anti" side wanted banned. @nero, @RogueStarGamez, @Sargon_of_Akkad, @Int_Aristocrat are a few I remember out of six or seven
Re: Editor note! (Score: 2, Informative) by useless@pipedot.org on 2014-11-12 22:28 (#2V0Z) Looks like it's just a simple web form:https://womenactionmedia.wufoo.com/forms/wam-twitter-harassment-reporting-tool/ Not sure why someone would not just use twitter's own mechanisms instead of some third party though. Re: Editor note! (Score: 1) by vanderhoth@pipedot.org on 2014-11-12 22:55 (#2V11) It basically just gives WAM first crack at "harassment" cases. Volunteers working with WAM can then make it a priority case for twitter to deal with. I assume at the expense of any other issues reported to twitter.So far though it's been effective in having non-harassing accounts like @nero and @RogueStarGamez temporarily suspended while twitter did a proper investigation.There was a tweet circulating with the names of people the "anti" side wanted banned. @nero, @RogueStarGamez, @Sargon_of_Akkad, @Int_Aristocrat are a few I remember out of six or seven
Re: Editor note! (Score: 1) by vanderhoth@pipedot.org on 2014-11-12 22:55 (#2V11) It basically just gives WAM first crack at "harassment" cases. Volunteers working with WAM can then make it a priority case for twitter to deal with. I assume at the expense of any other issues reported to twitter.So far though it's been effective in having non-harassing accounts like @nero and @RogueStarGamez temporarily suspended while twitter did a proper investigation.There was a tweet circulating with the names of people the "anti" side wanted banned. @nero, @RogueStarGamez, @Sargon_of_Akkad, @Int_Aristocrat are a few I remember out of six or seven