Bruce Byfield: KDE5 Plasma is the best desktop

in linux on 2014-07-25 12:33 (#3RP)

Everyone knows opinions are like noses: everyone has one. But Bruce Byfield has been at it longer than most, and his opinion often reflects the industry. And he loves KDE5.

At a time when the Linux desktop offers six main alternatives (Cinnamon, GNOME, KDE Plasma, LXDE, Mate, Unity and Xfce), KDE Plasma consistently tops reader polls with an average of 35-40 percent. In such a diverse market, these figures indicate a broad appeal that other Linux desktop alternatives can't match.

I believe that one of the main reasons for this appeal is the KDE design philosophy. GNOME and Unity may offer a more aesthetic-looking default, but only at the cost of simplifying both the desktop and the utilities in the name of reducing clutter.

By contrast, KDE goes to the opposite extreme. KDE applications typically include every function you can imagine. Sometimes, they can take a version or two to organize the menus in a meaningful way, but applications like Amarok, K3B, or digiKam go far beyond the most common use cases. When you run into problems with them, they usually offer solutions.

Read the rest of his thoughtful and insightful review here.

[Ed. note: Actually, opinions are like something else. But Pipedot is a family-friendly site.]

Re: I'm offended! (Score: 1)

by skarjak@pipedot.org on 2014-07-25 20:52 (#2N6)

I don't really think it's about not wanting to think, it's mostly about wanting to be able to find what you want as fast as possible. A program that includes everything will naturally add a lot of noise which will make it harder to find the option you need. Obviously you also need a basic set of features if you're gonna do any work, in that sense I perfectly understand the frustration with designers who make things "clean" at the cost of functionality.

The average user does want to think: he wants to think about the task at hand. I'd rather spend my brain's processing power dealing with whatever I wanted to do than to use it trying to figure out my tools. Yes, you can discover things you might not have expected when you are given complex tools, but an enterprising spirit would have sought out those advanced techniques anyway.

This is why I prefer to deal with those things using extensions, or simply choosing to install more advanced software if needed. To me a program like thunar is really striking the perfect balance: it does all that an average user might want, provides more niche functions in an unobtrusive fashion and is extensible as well

Isn't the unix philosophy to do one thing, and to do it well? I like that way of thinking. :)