Geopolymer concrete like the Romans

in science on (#2VJQ)
story imageHackaday is reporting on an interesting advance in the science of producing geopolymer concrete:
For all the things Romans got wrong (lead pipes anyone?) did you know we’re still using a less advanced concrete than they did? Consider some of the massive structures in Rome that have passed the test of time, lasting for more than 2000 years. The typical concrete that we use in construction starts to degrade after only 50 years.

Researchers at Berkeley think they’ve finally figured it out with thanks to a sample that was removed from the Pozzuoli Bay near Naples, Italy. This could vastly improve the durability of modern concrete, and even reduce the carbon footprint from making it. The downside is a longer curing time, and resource allocation — it wouldn’t be possible to completely replace modern cement due to the limited supply of fly ash (an industrial waste product produced by burning coal). Their research can be found in a few articles, however they are both behind pay walls.

Lucky for us, and the open source community at large, someone from MIT has also been working on perfecting the formula — and he’s shared his results thus far.

Re: Wrong and wrong again... The Romans cement was NOT more advanced (Score: 1)

by on 2014-12-05 16:33 (#2VMN)

Well, you can still see the apartments that were around Rome in places, but yeah, it is entirely possible that the importance of a building might make people less likely to use it as a building site.. or it might have made the Vandals less likely to light it on fire when they invaded, and so on.. there are many many explanations for why much of the cement romans used hasn't survived, being crap is only one on a long list of possibilities.

Yeah, it would be, but it's not unheard of.. the Murano glassmakers of Venice seem to have help onto a lot of their secrets for a long while.
Post Comment
The number of body parts in the list wine, chin, rainjacket, underpants and bread is?